New Survey Reveals Uncertainty Among Afterschool Program Providers

Source: www.pexels.com

Temescal Associates recently surveyed afterschool leaders on their concerns regarding 2026. The Afterschool Alliance did a similar but much larger survey of afterschool leaders entitled, Uncertain Times for Afterschool Programs. The findings were very similar. Below is a guest blog by Nikki Yamashiro, Vice President, Research at the Afterschool Alliance on the survey’s findings.

Since 2020, the Afterschool Alliance has surveyed afterschool and summer program providers to capture the current state of the afterschool field in order to better understand providers’ offerings and operations, as well as identify the issues that are most pressing.  

What stands out in the most recent survey, conducted October 27 through December 22, 2025, is that concerns about program sustainability and students’ well-being are on the rise, largely reaching the levels of concern we haven’t seen since the early days of the pandemic. A few key points from the brief, “Uncertain times for afterschool programs: Concerns over sustainability, students’ well-being, and federal actions top of mind,” include: 

• Afterschool program providers’ worries about program sustainability are trending upward. Providers concerned about losing funding, permanently closing their program, or laying off or furloughing staff increased by double-digit percentage points from fall 2024, with worries rising for the second consecutive year. For example, 56% of providers were concerned about the loss of funding to their program in the fall of 2023, increasing to 63% in fall 2024, and reaching 77% in the fall of 2025. The intensity of providers’ level of concern has also grown—providers extremely or very concerned about the loss of funding grew from 32% in 2023 to 40% in 2024, and now, more than half of providers (55%) are extremely or very concerned about losing funding.

“When asked which resources would be most helpful to their program right now, the top answer selected by program providers reflects their growing concerns about funding.” – Afterschool Alliance

Source: A World Fit for Kids

• Providers, regardless of where they are located, are concerned about their funding and future.  Nearly 9 in 10 providers (88%) are concerned about their long-term funding and program’s future, including 67% who are extremely or very concerned. At least 5 in 6 providers across community-types and regions are concerned: this includes programs located in rural (89%), suburban (86%), and urban communities (90%), and in the Northeast (87%), Midwest (89%), South (90%), and West (85%).



“Our funding has been getting cut every year. Each year we are making more and more sacrifices to our quality of programming.” – Afterschool Program Leader, SF 

• Concerns for students—in particular about food insecurity, learning loss, and screen time—are high. While students’ mental and emotional health remains the most prominent concern among program providers, worries about students experiencing food insecurity, learning loss, and unproductive screen time harming their well-being saw significant gains from the previous fall 2024 provider survey. 93% of providers are concerned about their students’ mental and emotional health, with 75% extremely or very concerned, similar to fall 2024 (93%), but providers reporting that they are extremely or very concerned about their students experiencing food insecurity grew from 51% to 64%, concerns over learning loss grew from 56% to 62%, and providers extremely or very concerned about unproductive screen time harming their students’ well-being increased from 63% to 71%.
 
• The disruptions and uncertainty at the federal level are having an effect on programs. More than 6 in 10 providers (62%) said that the children and families they served were impacted at least somewhat by the six-week federal government shutdown that lasted from October 1 through November 12, 2025. And most providers (86%) said that if proposed federal education budget cuts are implemented, they are concerned about the impact to their program. Additionally, nearly half of program providers (46%)  reported being impacted by the withholding of federal funds that took place during the summer of 2025.

“On April 3, the Trump Administration released the proposed federal budget for fiscal year 2027. While the budget proposal is a ‘skinny budget’ that does not include all funding details, it does suggest consolidation of federal education funds and elimination of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) program, the only federal funding that exclusively supports local, school and community afterschool and summer learning programs.” – Erik Peterson, Afterschool Alliance

Source: Champions

• Programs impacted by federal government actions are more likely to be concerned about sustainability and their students’ well-being. Afterschool program providers who report that the children and families they served were significantly impacted by the government shutdown and those who said that they were affected by the withholding of education funds last summer are more likely than programs overall to express extreme levels of concern about their program sustainability by double-digit percentage point differences. Providers who were significantly affected by the government shutdown are also more likely to be concerned about their students’ well-being, in particular about food insecurity. For example, 83% of programs who were affected a lot by the government shutdown are extremely or very concerned about their students experiencing food insecurity, 19 percentage points higher than programs overall (64%).

“Sustainability of our 21st CCLC programs is a major concern.” – Afterschool Program Leader, Reno, Nevada



In spite of these concerns and challenges afterschool programs face, they continue to provide young people with opportunities for academic enrichment, time to be active and outdoors, and access to healthy snacks and meals, all while helping to build foundational skills such as the ability to work in teams, think critically, and be leaders. Additionally, providers remain optimistic overall about their future; 69% of providers say that they feel optimistic about the future of their afterschool program, an increase from 62% in fall 2024.

MORE ABOUT...

Nikki Yamashiro

Nikki Yamashiro is Vice President, Research at Afterschool Alliance. She joined the Afterschool Alliance in June 2012. In her current role, Nikki coordinates, manages, and advances the Afterschool Alliance’s research efforts, including developing the organization's research goals and agenda and effectively communicating findings on afterschool and summer programs to policy makers, afterschool providers, advocates, and the public. Current major research initiatives that are a part of Nikki's portfolio include America After 3PM, a longitudinal study of how children in America spend their hours after school, and Afterschool in the Time of COVID-19, a multi-wave tracking survey documenting the pandemic's impact on the afterschool field. Prior to joining the Afterschool Alliance, Nikki served in a variety of research capacities, including as Policy Advisor at Third Way, where she handled domestic policy issues such as juvenile justice, and as legislative assistant to former Rep. Hilda L. Solis, where she handled education and youth issues.

The Afterschool Alliance was established in 2000 by a small group of corporate and foundation philanthropies—including the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education, JCPenney Company, Inc., the Open Society Institute/The After-School Corporation, the Entertainment Industry Foundation and the Creative Artists Agency Foundation—to expand afterschool and summer learning opportunities nationwide. Since our inception, public investment in afterschool programs has doubled. 

Today, the Alliance works with a broad range of organizations and supporters, including policymakers, government agencies, youth, parent and education groups, business and philanthropic leaders, afterschool coalitions and providers at the national, state, and local levels, and leaders representing health and wellness, college and career readiness, social and emotional learning, science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) learning, and more—each with a stake in afterschool. 

 

Trump and Afterschool- What You Need to Know

Source: Google Gemini AI Generated Image

By Sam Piha

Given the rapid pace of President Trump’s executive orders and announcements, we thought it was important to get the latest on the impacts on afterschool funding. To learn more we interviewed Erik Peterson, Senior Vice President of Policy at the Afterschool Alliance. See our questions and his responses below. 

Q: We know that Trump's executive actions will have a large impact on schools. Anything here we should be alerted to?

Erik Peterson

A: There are several Presidential Actions or Executive Orders that are impacting or will impact schools. We have seen Executive Orders target specific educational practices, such as diversity, equity and inclusion programs and teaching about certain topics like race or gender, and some schools are making changes to how they approach or teach these topics as a result. The Executive Order on school discipline could influence local district policies on discipline by potentially limiting certain approaches to discipline and impacting how schools deal with student behavior, possibly creating a more restrictive environment. 

The Executive Order promoting educational freedom and choice by expanding options for families, such as school vouchers or alternative educational settings, does not yet appear to have had a widespread impact on schools, but could potentially shift resources and influence how families choose their children's education.  

Executive Orders and agency policies on immigration and deportation have reportedly impacted school and afterschool attendance and the feeling of a safe school environment. Many of the Orders are being challenged through the federal justice system, and state and local laws or policies can run counter to the Executive Orders. Afterschool programs can share the impact of these, or other Executive Orders as well as grant terminations here: https://3to6.co/2025stories

Q: We know that any actions that impact schools may affect afterschool programs. However, there are more direct actions, such as the threat to 21st Century Community Learning Centers. Do we have any definitive news about funding that goes directly to afterschool programs? 

A: The proposed “skinny” budget for FY 26 released by the Trump Administration on May 2 would have a devastating impact on schools, if Congress chooses to follow the proposal. The budget proposal seeks to cut the Department of Education budget by $12.4 billion (15% from current level). It proposes a cut of $4.535 billion across K-12 programs; although mostly preserves Title I funding (it does propose to eliminate $428 million from Title I, Part C “Migrant Education and Special Programs for Migrant Students” which aim to ensure that all children of migratory farm workers and fishers reach challenging academic standards.)   

The budget proposes a $2 billion block grant for 18 other K-12 programs into a new “K-12 Simplified Funding Program;” and proposes level funding for Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) as well as a new "Special Education Simplified Funding Program" that consolidates seven unnamed IDEA programs. Finally, the “skinny” budget seeks to eliminate TRIO, GEAR UP, Federal Work Study, and the Preschool Development Grant Birth through Five (PDG B-5) program. There is a proposed funding increase of $60 million for Charter Schools, which would bring total funding for the federal charter school program to $500 million.



Source: Camp EDMO

With regard to afterschool programs specifically, the “skinny” budget proposal appears to eliminate the current, dedicated $1.329 billion 21st CCLC program through the proposed consolidation of 18 education discretionary and formula grant programs into one block grant totaling only $2 billion; and then proposing to cut the existing programs by $4.535 billion. It is possible afterschool and summer could be an allowable use of the new “K-12 Simplified Funding Program” for schools, however that means 21st CCLC funding as we know it would be eliminated as community-based organizations, faith-based organizations, etc., would no longer be eligible for grants, and activity funding for capacity supports/professional development would go away. 

The full budget proposal from the President is expected later in May or in June. Again, it is important to emphasize that this is a proposal only; Congress can reject it as they did similar proposals to eliminate 21st CCLC from President Trump in his budgets from 2017-2020.

Q: For those who wish to advocate to preserve funding for afterschool, do you have any thoughts? 

A: Advocates, partners, young people, and friends of afterschool and summer programs have a range of actions they can take. Reaching out to your Senators and Representatives is a first step – sharing the impact of afterschool and summer programs and how federal funding for these programs supports children, youth, families, and communities, being specific as possible. Advocates can also make sure local and state elected officials are aware of the importance of federal afterschool and summer funding as well and ask their help in making the case for ongoing funding. Perhaps the best strategy is site visits, working to get Members of Congress and their staff to visit local afterschool or summer programs and see firsthand the impact these programs are having. A site visit toolkit can be found here: https://afterschoolalliance.org/reachPolicySiteVisit.cfm  and more ways to advocate can be found here: https://afterschoolworksforamerica.org/ 

Another important thought on funding for afterschool programs, is that the federal uncertainty is an opportunity to continue the progress at the state level for advocating for state afterschool and summer funding. In the past several years we have seen more than 10 new states begin investing in afterschool and/or summer learning opportunities, bringing the total to 27. State funding streams can reflect the needs of local communities and can help make federal investments go further, and the 50 statewide afterschool networks have been key leaders and partners in expanding state funding for local programs. For more on the state afterschool funding landscape see:  https://www.afterschoolalliance.org/afterschoolsnack/2024-in-review-New-state-investments-help-grow-support-for_01-09-2025.cfm

Q: For those who wish to send a letter to their Congressperson advocating for afterschool funding, do you have any suggestions on what they should emphasize, such as the number of kids that may be impacted, etc.?



A: Advocates should emphasize the impact the program is having on children, families and community. Providing number of students served, as well as any outcomes from evaluations covering academics and other supports, can help paint the picture of how valuable these programs are. Anecdotes that provide specifics of how the programs are helping families are valuable. Describing what might happen if the program loses funding is also important. Finally, the messenger is important as well - parents reaching out to Congress about how important these programs are can help illustrate why funding must not be eliminated or reduced.

MORE ABOUT...

Erik Peterson joined the Afterschool Alliance in July 2009 and coordinates and advances the Afterschool Alliance’s policy efforts at the federal level by helping develop policy goals and implementing strategies that advance access to quality afterschool and summer learning programs for all. Erik works to build and strengthen relationships with policy makers and allied organizations to increase public support and funding for out of school time programs. Prior to coming to the Afterschool Alliance, Erik worked for the School Nutrition Association (SNA) in the Washington DC area, and as both an AmeriCorps VISTA and staff for the Sustainable Food Center in Austin, Texas. 

The Afterschool Alliance works to ensure that all youth have access to affordable, quality afterschool programs by engaging public will to increase public and private investment in afterschool program initiatives at the national, state, and local levels. They are an effective voice for afterschool in efforts to expand quality affordable afterschool and summer programs. The Alliance serves as an information source on afterschool programs and resources and encourages the development of local, state, and national afterschool constituencies and systems. The Alliance strives to communicate the impact of afterschool programs on children, families, and communities. 

Tracking Federal 21st CCLC Funding

By Sam Piha

Sam Piha

We have been following President Trump’s proposed budget which eliminates the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program. 

Below is an update from Lucy Friedman of ExpandEd Schools.

“The House Appropriations Committee voted to pass a spending bill that would cut $2.4 billion from the Department of Education.

Lucy Friedman

While the House bill improved on the Trump Administration proposal by rejecting its shortsighted attempt to completely eliminate the 21st Century Community Learning Centers (CCLC) Program, it still results in a $191 million cut from the previous year. Ultimately, the House bill falls short in providing the critical support needed to provide high-quality and evidence-based after-school programming for 1.6 million children in families in high-need communities across the country.”

In California alone, this would result in more than a  $20 million cut to 21st CCLC afterschool programs, with a $10 million cut to high school afterschool programs.

Photo Credit: Long Beach Youth Institute

Ms. Friedman goes on to state, “We hope that the Senate will course correct and provide the necessary supports for critical education programs that help all children succeed. ExpandED Schools and our fellow advocates like Every Hour Counts will continue to keep you abreast of federal policy news and ways you can help. Stay up-to-date on the latest news by signing up here and keep calling your senators to let them know you care about education.”

You can also track the budget process and learn how you can add your input by going to the Afterschool Alliance website. 

_________________________

You can read other blogs by the LIAS project by going to: 

• Expanded Learning 360°/365 Project website
• LIAS Blog Written for the California Afterschool Network

Advocacy in the Era of Trump, Part 2

By Sam Piha

Sam Piha

Throughout its history, afterschool has always had to promote its value and identity around the issues of the day. With each change in the presidential administration, there are risks and opportunities that we should be aware of, and adjust our advocacy accordingly.

President Trump communicated his ideas using very specific language during his campaign and transition. Is there anything we can learn about how best to advocate for afterschool funding? In this new era of Trump, we asked Betsy Brand, Executive Director of the American Youth Policy Forum, and Jodi Grant, Executive Director of the Afterschool Alliance, about this. Below is part 2 of their responses. See part 1 here.

Q: President Trump also talks a lot about jobs. Do you think it will be important to stress "workforce development" and "workforce skills" that are part of afterschool?

Betsy Brand, AYPF

Betsy Brand: Afterschool programs are natural venues for helping older youth develop knowledge, skills, and abilities that lead to success in the workplace, life, and community. Skills like teamwork, problem-solving, communication, and critical thinking are all highly valued by employers. Afterschool and summer school programs can help develop those skills. We should not be shy in telling that story.

Jodi Grant,
Afterschool Alliance

Jodi Grant: Absolutely. Many of the character education, social emotional learning and youth development skills that afterschool programs focus on are just as essential to workforce preparation. Making that connection for people — framing those skills and this learning as workforce development — makes a lot of sense. The same is true for all the opportunities provided to our youth to learn about, intern, apprentice in the community, and even work as part of their afterschool programs. That’s why the National Afterschool Summit, to be held at the University of Southern California on April 5th, will focus on making sure our students are ready to work. 

Photo Credit: Youth Institute, Long Beach 

Q: The "red" rural counties were strong supporters of President Trump. Do you think that promoting access to afterschool in rural areas is important, given the new political climate? 

Betsy Brand: Promoting access to high quality afterschool in rural communities is not a red or blue issue – it’s an issue of fairness and accessibility. The challenge is that many rural communities don’t have lots of afterschool providers like suburbs and cities, so it is hard to provide engaging, high quality afterschool programs. State afterschool, education, and youth leaders can work with rural communities to help develop their capacity to better serve youth and ensure they have opportunities for meaningful participation in the non-school hours.

Photo Credit: Brilliant Maps

Jodi Grant: Promoting access to rural areas has always been vital and, in fact, the Afterschool Alliance has issued several reports, including one just last year, America After 3PM Special Report: The Growing Importance of Afterschool in Rural Communities, highlighting the unique challenges students and parents in rural America face in their pursuit of high quality afterschool programs.  We hope that the President and Secretary DeVos will embrace afterschool as a way to enhance education in rural America.  

--------------
URGENT UPDATE FROM THE AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE
"President Trump has just unveiled his budget priorities—and his plan singles out afterschool funding for elimination." To learn more, click here. 


LIAS will also be posting a blog on these developments.

Advocacy in the Era of Trump, Part 1

By Sam Piha

Sam  Piha

Throughout its history, afterschool has always had to promote its value and identity around the issues of the day. With each change in the Presidential administration, there are risks and opportunities that we should be aware of, and adjust our advocacy accordingly.

President Trump communicated his ideas using very specific language during his campaign and transition. Is there anything we can learn about how best to advocate for afterschool funding? In this new era of Trump, we asked Betsy Brand, Executive Director of the American Youth Policy Forum, and Jodi Grant, Executive Director of the Afterschool Alliance, about this. Below is part 1 of their responses. 

Q: The new President appears to have a high regard for law enforcement. Law enforcement officials were strong advocates at the federal and state level for afterschool. Do you envision that we will again engage law enforcement organizations in the effort to preserve the federal 21st CCLC funding?

Betsy Brand, AYPF

Betsy Brand: As the new Administration focuses on improving safety in our communities, it seems a natural step to talk about how afterschool programs involve youth in positive and engaging activities, in the non-school hours. Law enforcement can be an important advocate for 21st CCLC funding and effective partners that bring valuable skills and resources to the table, not just in this political climate but anytime.

Jodi Grant,
Afterschool Alliance

Jodi Grant: Law enforcement officials have been strong partners for afterschool all along because they recognize how important it is for youth to engage constructively with their peers and with adults. Across the country a lot of afterschool programs have strong relationships with law enforcement agencies, ranging from Police Athletic League programs to partnerships with local police. One great thing about bringing police officers into programs, often as volunteers, is that it fosters powerful personal relationships that can not only change lives, but change the discourse between police, youth and parents. It’s an example of community policing at its best. 

For more than a year the Afterschool Alliance’s blog has been featuring stories of afterschool programs working with local law enforcement. (The most recent story can be found here.) We value the partnerships not just because of the terrific work that police are doing with kids in afterschool programs, but because it’s so important for the public to understand the reach of afterschool programs. The messenger can be as important as the message, and law enforcement voices are going to be more essential than ever in helping us preserve federal afterschool funding.  

Photo Credit: http://www.stlasap.org/

Q: President Trump talks a lot about crime, safety, and drug abuse. Do you predict that we will need to return to a "deficit" or prevention model to capture his attention to preserve afterschool funding?

Betsy Brand: We should not return to a deficit model, but rather focus on the benefits of afterschool in terms of helping young people find engaging, satisfying, and meaningful activities in which they can participate during the non-school hours and that help them develop skills that lead to success. The deficit model language should be retired once and for all.

Jodi Grant: Afterschool programs are effective and popular because they keep kids safe, help working parents and inspire students to learn. While today, a lot of policymakers think about afterschool in terms of the third prong of that message, it was actually the first two prongs that generated the political will to create a federal funding stream for afterschool. Students spend 80 percent of their waking hours outside school and they are always learning – every minute. So the question is: What will we teach them? They can learn skills at an afterschool program that will help them succeed in school, at work and in life or, if we leave them unsupervised, they can engage in activities that are inappropriate, dangerous or even illegal, and learn a very different set of lessons. As the President focuses on crime, drug abuse and other ills in our society, it is important for us to highlight the impact that afterschool has in teaching the right lessons and in preventing inappropriate behavior in our students.  

From a communications standpoint, if highlighting negative consequences can help us build support to provide resources to the 11.3 million children who go home alone each day and are unsupervised when they get there, then it is worth making that argument. 

Once we have our students in a safe place, we can do so much more to inspire them to get out of their comfort zones and achieve dreams that might not have been possible before. 

--------------
URGENT UPDATE FROM THE AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE
"President Trump has just unveiled his budget priorities—and his plan singles out afterschool funding for elimination." To learn more, click here. 

LIAS will also be posting a blog on these developments.

Save Quality Afterschool

By Sam Piha

Sam Piha

There are calls for improving the quality of afterschool programs. The California Department of Education has issued new quality standards and there are numerous toolkits to assist afterschool programs. In response to this call, we have assembled a number of program improvement learning circles. 

The number one barrier to program improvement is financial resources. It takes time on the part of the afterschool staff to seriously work to improve practice and program quality. And between the stagnant funding levels and the rise in labor costs, afterschool budgets are simply too stressed to take on the challenge of program improvement. 

Photo Credit: www.saveafterschool.com

In an article entitled "Some After-School Program Providers Say Flat Funding May Cause Them to Close", written by Susan Frey for EdSource, she wrote:

A survey of after-school program providers found that 29 percent of respondents – including large programs such as LA’s BEST and THINKTogether – say they are likely to close in the next two years without an increase in the daily reimbursement rate from the state.

More than 86 percent of providers said they were having trouble hiring quality staff, and two-thirds said their programs had a waiting list, according to the survey by the Oakland-based advocacy group Partnership for Children & Youth. 

Each year, more than 400,000 students in over 4,000 elementary and middle schools participate in these programs, which are located primarily in high-poverty neighborhoods. The programs offer tutoring, sports and enrichment activities such as arts and science projects. They also provide a safe place for elementary and middle school children while their parents are working.

The daily reimbursement rate of $7.50 per student for three hours of programming has not changed since the After School Education and Safety Act was passed 10 years ago. The law provides $550 million each year for the programs, but does not include a cost-of-living adjustment.

Meanwhile, since 2007 the Consumer Price Index has increased by about 19 percent, the state minimum wage has grown by 33 percent and state law now requires employers to offer three days of annual sick leave.

There are a number of afterschool advocates that are working to raise the funding levels of state ASES programs. You can learn more and choose to get involved by going to http://www.saveafterschool.com/. 

Photo Credit: www.saveafterschool.com

Dependable Funding? It's Up To Us!

By Sam Piha

Sam Piha

The afterschool movement first went to scale in the 1990s with allocation of public tax dollars: federal funding of 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) by the federal government and the release of tax dollars for California afterschool programs, mandated by Proposition 49. People assume that these funds are stable, but in fact they are threatened by legislators seeking to reduce these funds. 

We strongly believe that every program provider and program leader should understand the history of public funding for afterschool programs and be involved in advocacy efforts to preserve these funds (for a background on the funding of afterschool programs in California, see Examining California’s Afterschool Movement Post Proposition 49). 

Bruno Marchesi,
Project Manager,
Center for Collaborative
Solutions

We asked an important leader in afterschool, Bruno Marchesi, Project Manager for the Center for Collaborative Solutions, to share his perspectives on this issue. 

Q: Afterschool and summer programs became widely accessible to families with the investment of public dollars. Can we assume that this funding is now safe and dependable?

A: Even though funding authorized for afterschool and summer learning programs have remained constant for the past 6 years through 21st Century Community Learning Centers at the national level, and constant since its initial implementation through the After School Education and Safety (ASES) legislation in California since 2006, the afterschool and summer learning field (or Expanded Learning as it is also known in California) should not assume that funding is currently safe and dependable.

I have served as the Co-Chief Reader for 21st CCLC grants for the past 3 cohorts and the reality is that the current need far exceeds the amount of funding available for these programs. In the last few 21st CCLC cohorts, it was stated that most likely 1 out of every 10 programs that applied for funding were approved. This does not even take into account the many organizations and school districts that chose to not apply for funding based on the previous year's shortage of funding. 

Although federal funding for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers has remained relatively constant over the past few years, every year there have been proposals to reduce the total amount, repurpose the dollars for other uses or consolidate the funding with other federal education dollars into block grants.

In California, we are probably in a better funding position, since ASES was voter approved and therefore it would need to be brought back to the voters to cut or take away the $550 million dollars per year allocated for these programs under Prop 49. Even though this is the case in California, the funding levels to sustain high quality programs have not gone up to reflect the rising operating costs of running these programs since the amount was first established in 2002 at $7.50 per child per day.

Q: Do program leaders have a responsibility at the local level to ensure that these funds are safe and dependable? Can program leaders support the work of advocates at the federal and state levels? 

A: Each and every person at all levels in the Expanded Learning field has a responsibility to address the funding for these afterschool and summer programs. Line staff have the responsibility to provide high quality programs. It is important that these programs operate at capacity each and every day so that students are engaged and continue to attend. This ensures that they maximize the funding allocations. 

Site Coordinators and program leadership have the responsibility to build champions in their local communities. From building partnerships with school principals and districts to create joint use agreements to work together. By working together, they can ensure that the afterschool program complements the regular school day goals and objectives through the Learning in Afterschool & Summer activities that are active, collaborative, meaningful, supports mastery, and expands horizons.

Site Coordinators and program leadership should stay informed at what is happening, not just at the local level, but also statewide and nationally when it comes to best practices, policy and funding. They are a critical component to support the work of advocates at the state and national level because the folks operating programs have access to the key stakeholders in their communities. These include the students, the families, school leadership, local businesses, etc. Because of these interactions they understand their community need, challenges and opportunities that could play a crucial role in helping to shape the agenda and key talking points for advocating organizations. 

Q: What organizations are advocating for the preservation of these funds at the federal level? 

A: Organizations like the Afterschool Alliance are doing a great job in advocating for the preservation of these funds by providing information about the impact of high quality programs around the country, creating awareness with legislators and key stakeholders to build champions not just in Washington, DC, but also at the local level through their Lights On Afterschool efforts and their America After 3 p.m. report. Organizations like the Afterschool Alliance are crucial to the preservation of these funds.

Q: What organizations are advocating for the preservation of these funds at the state level? 

A: Organizations like the California Afterschool Advocacy Alliance (CA3), the Partnership for Children and Youth (PCY), the California School Age Consortium (CalSAC), among others are leading the way in advocating for the preservation of after school and summer learning program funding and sustainability.

In California, we have a large network of technical assistance providers like the California AfterSchool Network (CAN) who keep the field informed. CAN serves as a vehicle to get information from the California Department of Education (CDE) down to the program level for implementation, and highlight the voice of the field back to CDE through its statewide initiatives and committees. 

Q: What can program providers and leaders do? 

A: There are many things that program stakeholders can do to continue to help to ensure that these funds continue to stay safe and dependable.

1. High quality programs: Make sure that you continue to operate high quality programs that support maximum attendance and complement the regular school day goals and objectives. 

2. Host program visits: You can host community partners or legislative visits. Many in your community may not be aware of your afterschool or summer program and the wonderful opportunities there may be to partner or build champions at the local or state level.

3. Participate in current advocacy efforts: There are multiple opportunities to provide voice and leadership at the statewide level through the CalSAC Challenge event, through any of the multiple California AfterSchool Network committees or share your knowledge and expertise at one of the many regional or statewide conferences and events.

4. Lights On Afterschool: Participate in the Lights On Afterschool Event by hosting an event at your site. You can also participate in the national movement by signing up your event through the Afterschool Alliance’s website and staying active in promoting the event through your social media channels. 

5. Create Partnerships: Find ways to create partnerships to leverage your funding and opportunities. Connect with your local food bank to bring in extra resources for your students and families, reach out to local businesses to match donations or serve as volunteers in your program. There are many local and statewide organizations that have multiple resources to offer for the exact population that you serve in your programs each day. 

---
For information on federal policy follow the Afterschool Snack blog posts at: http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/afterschoolsnack/ASnack.cfm and also follow the Afterschool Alliance on Facebook and Twitter.

To register your Lights On Afterschool site and to get event tools and kits go to: http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/loa.cfm

To learn more about supply, demand and parent satisfaction with afterschool across America and in your state go to: http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/AA3PM/
______________________
Bruno Marchesi serves as Project Manager for the Center for Collaborative Solutions. He has more than 18 years of after school and summer programs experience at all levels including frontline staff, Site Coordinator, Program Manager, and most recently as Program Director of the California AfterSchool Network at the UC Davis School of Education. Bruno's passion and drive come from his own core values of humility, integrity, and service.

Saving 21st CCLC Funding

By Sam Piha

Sam Piha

Members of the US Senate are, again, threatening funding for the 21st CCLC program. The funding would be consolidated into a block grant available to school districts to use for multiple purposes.

To oppose this, the New York State Afterschool Network  (NYSAN) advises “Taking action is FREE and generates IMMEDIATE RESULTS!

• Call your two senators and your representative! Calls take about 30 seconds and they matter. Offices track how many calls they get about each issue – we need more calls supporting 21^st CCLC! All you have to say to the receptionist is 'Please maintain funding for 21^st Century Community Learning Centers in the ESEA reauthorization.' That’s it! You can call again weekly to maximize your impact.

• Email congress too! Offices also track the emails they get on each issue.

• Use social media to get others involved: Twitter: #Afterschoolworks for kids b/c of #21stCCLC & Congress proposed eliminating this $$. Take action! http://bit.ly/1zbayyT #Save21st

• Forward this email to your contacts! Program staff, parents, grandparents, and even participants can make a difference!"

Afterschool advocates have recommended that rather than focusing on the negative evidence that is being cited by 21st CCLC opponents, familiarize yourself and make use of the evaluation literature that supports the effectiveness of 21st CCLCs. You can go to the Afterschool Alliance website to find important research. 

We reached out to Jodi Grant, Executive Director of the Afterschool Alliance, to gather additional evaluation information. She replied:

“Here are the specific findings from other evaluations you can point to:

Jodi Grant, ED
Afterschool Alliance

• An evaluation of Texas 21^st Century Community Learning Centers found that the program positively impacted students’ school day performance. Students attending the program—both students with low levels and high levels of participation in the program— were more likely to be promoted to the next grade. The likelihood of being promoted to the next grade increased by 43 percent for students with low levels of participation in the program, and 47 percent for students with high levels of participation. Additionally, ACE students saw improvements in their Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) reading and math scores. (American Institutes for Research, 2013)

• Students regularly attending Washington’s 21^st CCLC afterschool programs saw improvements in their reading and math achievement, as well as a positive impact on their overall GPA, compared to their non-participating peers. (American Institutes for Research, 2014)

• A statewide longitudinal evaluation of the After School Safety and Enrichment for Teens (ASSETs) program—California’s high school component of the 21^st CCLC program— found that students participating in the ASSETs program received higher ELA and math assessment scores, and performed better on the ELA and math sections of the CAHSEE than non-participants. (CRESST, 2012)

• Teachers of students participating in Wisconsin 21^st CCLC programs reported more than two-thirds improved their class participation, 60 percent saw improvements in their motivation to learn and 55 percent improved their behavior in class. Teachers also reported that 48 percent of students improved in volunteering for extra credit or responsibility. (Wisconsin Department of Instruction, 2014)

These are just a few studies that show that 21^st CCLC programs work.”

She also suggested this fact sheet and a briefing paper on afterschool evaluations.