Trump and Afterschool- What You Need to Know

Source: Google Gemini AI Generated Image

By Sam Piha

Given the rapid pace of President Trump’s executive orders and announcements, we thought it was important to get the latest on the impacts on afterschool funding. To learn more we interviewed Erik Peterson, Senior Vice President of Policy at the Afterschool Alliance. See our questions and his responses below. 

Q: We know that Trump's executive actions will have a large impact on schools. Anything here we should be alerted to?

Erik Peterson

A: There are several Presidential Actions or Executive Orders that are impacting or will impact schools. We have seen Executive Orders target specific educational practices, such as diversity, equity and inclusion programs and teaching about certain topics like race or gender, and some schools are making changes to how they approach or teach these topics as a result. The Executive Order on school discipline could influence local district policies on discipline by potentially limiting certain approaches to discipline and impacting how schools deal with student behavior, possibly creating a more restrictive environment. 

The Executive Order promoting educational freedom and choice by expanding options for families, such as school vouchers or alternative educational settings, does not yet appear to have had a widespread impact on schools, but could potentially shift resources and influence how families choose their children's education.  

Executive Orders and agency policies on immigration and deportation have reportedly impacted school and afterschool attendance and the feeling of a safe school environment. Many of the Orders are being challenged through the federal justice system, and state and local laws or policies can run counter to the Executive Orders. Afterschool programs can share the impact of these, or other Executive Orders as well as grant terminations here: https://3to6.co/2025stories

Q: We know that any actions that impact schools may affect afterschool programs. However, there are more direct actions, such as the threat to 21st Century Community Learning Centers. Do we have any definitive news about funding that goes directly to afterschool programs? 

A: The proposed “skinny” budget for FY 26 released by the Trump Administration on May 2 would have a devastating impact on schools, if Congress chooses to follow the proposal. The budget proposal seeks to cut the Department of Education budget by $12.4 billion (15% from current level). It proposes a cut of $4.535 billion across K-12 programs; although mostly preserves Title I funding (it does propose to eliminate $428 million from Title I, Part C “Migrant Education and Special Programs for Migrant Students” which aim to ensure that all children of migratory farm workers and fishers reach challenging academic standards.)   

The budget proposes a $2 billion block grant for 18 other K-12 programs into a new “K-12 Simplified Funding Program;” and proposes level funding for Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) as well as a new "Special Education Simplified Funding Program" that consolidates seven unnamed IDEA programs. Finally, the “skinny” budget seeks to eliminate TRIO, GEAR UP, Federal Work Study, and the Preschool Development Grant Birth through Five (PDG B-5) program. There is a proposed funding increase of $60 million for Charter Schools, which would bring total funding for the federal charter school program to $500 million.



Source: Camp EDMO

With regard to afterschool programs specifically, the “skinny” budget proposal appears to eliminate the current, dedicated $1.329 billion 21st CCLC program through the proposed consolidation of 18 education discretionary and formula grant programs into one block grant totaling only $2 billion; and then proposing to cut the existing programs by $4.535 billion. It is possible afterschool and summer could be an allowable use of the new “K-12 Simplified Funding Program” for schools, however that means 21st CCLC funding as we know it would be eliminated as community-based organizations, faith-based organizations, etc., would no longer be eligible for grants, and activity funding for capacity supports/professional development would go away. 

The full budget proposal from the President is expected later in May or in June. Again, it is important to emphasize that this is a proposal only; Congress can reject it as they did similar proposals to eliminate 21st CCLC from President Trump in his budgets from 2017-2020.

Q: For those who wish to advocate to preserve funding for afterschool, do you have any thoughts? 

A: Advocates, partners, young people, and friends of afterschool and summer programs have a range of actions they can take. Reaching out to your Senators and Representatives is a first step – sharing the impact of afterschool and summer programs and how federal funding for these programs supports children, youth, families, and communities, being specific as possible. Advocates can also make sure local and state elected officials are aware of the importance of federal afterschool and summer funding as well and ask their help in making the case for ongoing funding. Perhaps the best strategy is site visits, working to get Members of Congress and their staff to visit local afterschool or summer programs and see firsthand the impact these programs are having. A site visit toolkit can be found here: https://afterschoolalliance.org/reachPolicySiteVisit.cfm  and more ways to advocate can be found here: https://afterschoolworksforamerica.org/ 

Another important thought on funding for afterschool programs, is that the federal uncertainty is an opportunity to continue the progress at the state level for advocating for state afterschool and summer funding. In the past several years we have seen more than 10 new states begin investing in afterschool and/or summer learning opportunities, bringing the total to 27. State funding streams can reflect the needs of local communities and can help make federal investments go further, and the 50 statewide afterschool networks have been key leaders and partners in expanding state funding for local programs. For more on the state afterschool funding landscape see:  https://www.afterschoolalliance.org/afterschoolsnack/2024-in-review-New-state-investments-help-grow-support-for_01-09-2025.cfm

Q: For those who wish to send a letter to their Congressperson advocating for afterschool funding, do you have any suggestions on what they should emphasize, such as the number of kids that may be impacted, etc.?



A: Advocates should emphasize the impact the program is having on children, families and community. Providing number of students served, as well as any outcomes from evaluations covering academics and other supports, can help paint the picture of how valuable these programs are. Anecdotes that provide specifics of how the programs are helping families are valuable. Describing what might happen if the program loses funding is also important. Finally, the messenger is important as well - parents reaching out to Congress about how important these programs are can help illustrate why funding must not be eliminated or reduced.

MORE ABOUT...

Erik Peterson joined the Afterschool Alliance in July 2009 and coordinates and advances the Afterschool Alliance’s policy efforts at the federal level by helping develop policy goals and implementing strategies that advance access to quality afterschool and summer learning programs for all. Erik works to build and strengthen relationships with policy makers and allied organizations to increase public support and funding for out of school time programs. Prior to coming to the Afterschool Alliance, Erik worked for the School Nutrition Association (SNA) in the Washington DC area, and as both an AmeriCorps VISTA and staff for the Sustainable Food Center in Austin, Texas. 

The Afterschool Alliance works to ensure that all youth have access to affordable, quality afterschool programs by engaging public will to increase public and private investment in afterschool program initiatives at the national, state, and local levels. They are an effective voice for afterschool in efforts to expand quality affordable afterschool and summer programs. The Alliance serves as an information source on afterschool programs and resources and encourages the development of local, state, and national afterschool constituencies and systems. The Alliance strives to communicate the impact of afterschool programs on children, families, and communities.